2010年4月2日
Peer review on Yit Wei's WA2
2010年3月2日
Peer view on Yit Wei
The essay is quite clear. The first paragraph gives readers a brief introduction of the essay, namely talking about the commitments and is followed by the expansion except the last conclusion paragraph with different concerns of each paragraph.
But the third paragraph is not that coherent, my recommendation is that the effect of forest fire towards climate change should be put in the first place. Here another problem came out, that is, some information or opinion which the writer provided is not accurate and lack of authority like the sentence below:
“Developing countries, particularly Indonesia must educate the population about the impact of forest fire toward the environment and climate change, and so to prevent deforestation activities to grow worst.”
Because in each paragraph with different concerns, the writer intended to contrast (compare) the different (same) responsibilities of developed and developing countries at the same time. When contrasting, the writer should care about more the showing sequence of developed countries and developing countries. That will make the whole essay more cohesive.
Last but nor least, I think that we are required to consider the factors that two groups must mull over before signing a new treaty, not only the commitments. For this part, at least in my personal view, I don’t see that in the essay. That is a pity, because in general, this is a good essay which answers the question mostly.
2010年2月6日
Summary of Presentation by Assistant professor Benjamin K. Sovacool --- Institutional and Individual Response to Climate Change Issues
We first look at the big picture of climate change conundrum. CO2 is the main green gas which causes climate change (global warming) and most green gas results from anthropic need of energy. Meanwhile, global warming is an Asian countries dominated problem. Although we have many protocols on climate change, few countries have successfully reduced their CO2 emission. There is a trend that the amount of carbon dioxide per capita in developed countries is relatively higher than that in developing countries. Thus both institutional actions and individual actions are called upon for fighting against climate change. Institutions can contribute in many sides: energy supply, transport, buildings, industry, agriculture and forestry, and waste management for instance; while individuals can make a difference by considering more sustainable factors on surrounding things. We may use renewable electricity or combined heat and power to promote energy efficiency. Technology in clear energy field needs our support and also needs novel characters to draw people’s attention. We can also help mitigate climate change by changing our food habits. Besides, a lot of energy is wasted for home use. Finally, in spite of the width and the depth of the world’s energy, food and climate changes, individuals’ behaviors are the essence. Institutions can regulate but we still have much to do and what we do matter!